Narrations about Mir: Facts and Assumptions

Abstract

This paper converses about the narrations, which are spread about Mir. Some of
the chronicles are true and are true to Mir's poetic accoutrements, but because of
the blind acceptance of many chronicles, the exact part of his word has
disappeared from our eyes. The reason for this is that the Mir who is the real Mir
could not appear before us. It was not the case that Mir's dominance was
accepted by later people but was accepted by the people of his own epoch,
nonetheless their basis was the same points that were considered during the
publication of his selected Gazals. The paper therefore attempts to revisit four
such basic assumptions: low and high of his poetic couplets, pessimism, general
tone, and selection of Mir, in order to know the facts.